Permission-aware by default
Does it keep each source's existing permissions, and can it hide the sensitive part of a file instead of refusing the whole file?
Compare
There are many ways to put AI on company knowledge. They differ most on one thing: whether you can prove each person and agent only ever saw what they were cleared to.
Here is an honest look at how Brain compares, and what to look for either way. Every page names the cases where the other product is the better choice, because a comparison that never does is not a comparison.
12 comparisons, grouped by the kind of product. Every one names the cases where the other product wins.
Broad work-AI platforms sold to whole organisations.
AI built into the workspace a team already writes in.
Tools for one person's knowledge, and what changes when a team shares it.
APIs and engines you build agent memory with.
Six questions worth asking of any option, including us.
Does it keep each source's existing permissions, and can it hide the sensitive part of a file instead of refusing the whole file?
Can you show security, legal and your board a tamper-evident, content-blind record of every access?
Can you bring your own model key, and is what you connect kept out of anybody's training data?
Does it govern AI across every source you actually use, or only inside one vendor's ecosystem?
Can you start without a sales process or a seat minimum, and prove the value before you sign anything?
If you run autonomous agents, does it give them limits, a human in the loop, and a kill switch?
/ Get started today